You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I saw... there are Masonry questions here. But, why to ask for Masonry if ultimate freedom of layout solution is Packery.
So? What do you think @rachelandrew Will CSS ever allow us to replace Packery by pure CSS solution. CSS Grid is close to it I think. But CSS Grid is strictly tabular, not so flexible and universal. I just asking. Will W3C ever comes with this kind of full "CSS Auto(placing layout)"? Or JS solution stay only solution for this kind of intelayout?
Thank you Rachel for your work on modernizing web!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In my question I didn't mean dragging feature. I asked about packing irregular boxes as tight as it can be without gaps. Logic on CSS Grid is strict. Here is total freedom.
Like CSS Grid with col/row size to be 1px auto repeat. ;)
I saw... there are Masonry questions here. But, why to ask for Masonry if ultimate freedom of layout solution is Packery.
So? What do you think @rachelandrew Will CSS ever allow us to replace Packery by pure CSS solution. CSS Grid is close to it I think. But CSS Grid is strictly tabular, not so flexible and universal. I just asking. Will W3C ever comes with this kind of full "CSS Auto(placing layout)"? Or JS solution stay only solution for this kind of intelayout?
Thank you Rachel for your work on modernizing web!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: