Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider assuming unparseable TypedDict annotations to be NotRequired #633

Open
JelleZijlstra opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider assuming unparseable TypedDict annotations to be NotRequired #633

JelleZijlstra opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Contributor

If NotRequired is used with from __future__ import annotations, we may not be able to parse the type. Consider always inferring NotRequired[] in that case.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JelleZijlstra