Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Extension Author Guide #1964

Closed
ebramirez opened this issue Apr 9, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Improve Extension Author Guide #1964

ebramirez opened this issue Apr 9, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
area/documentation area/user-experience Will make us lose users triage/duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@ebramirez
Copy link
Contributor

This is a request to improve the Extension Author Guide.

The current documentation is pretty impressive but completely inaccessible for the uninitiated like me.

A real life example would be of tremendous help. For example, I would like to create a Quarkus extension for Vaadin, which looks like a rewrite of the project Vaadin CDI, but I don't know where to start.

The ideal examples would have several blocks like: "Look for THIS (Example of initialization, instrumentation, etc) which translates into THAT (equivalent operation in Quarkus)".

Hope this makes sense.

@ebramirez
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like @manovotn had similar thoughts in #1690.

@starksm64
Copy link
Contributor

The guide has been significantly expanded in the 0.13 release, so what feedback do you have on that relative to this issue?

https://quarkus.io/guides/extension-authors-guide

@ebramirez
Copy link
Contributor Author

ebramirez commented Apr 10, 2019

The guide has been significantly expanded in the 0.13 release, so what feedback do you have on that relative to this issue?

You are right that the docs have improved, but still, an example of how to write an extension from scratch would be fantastic.

@danielpetisme
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed on Zulip, I'll work on this one.

@Dufgui
Copy link
Contributor

Dufgui commented Sep 4, 2019

it's maybe a duplicate of #2277 now no ? or is there any still some improvement missing ?
@danielpetisme @ebramirez

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 13, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!
We are doing this automatically to ensure out-of-date issues does not stay around indefinitely.
If you believe this issue is still relevant please put a comment on it on why and if it truly needs to stay request or add 'pinned' label.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Nov 13, 2019
@maxandersen maxandersen removed the stale label Nov 13, 2019
@gsmet gsmet added the pinned Issue will never be marked as stale label Nov 13, 2019
@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Nov 13, 2019

Closing as duplicate of #2277 .

@gsmet gsmet closed this as completed Nov 13, 2019
@gsmet gsmet added triage/duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed pinned Issue will never be marked as stale labels Nov 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/documentation area/user-experience Will make us lose users triage/duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants