We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Notes from a Zulip discussion:
Having apparently unrelated config properties is an issue IMHO. I would rather have a route. config group with everything there.
route.
Also:
Something like:
...route.expose = ...route.host = ...route.annotations."value" = ...route.secure =
Also I don't know if it makes sense to allow to define several routes? Maybe it's not worth it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
/cc @iocanel @geoand
Sorry, something went wrong.
+1 for moving all the relevant Route config into a dedicated root
I doubt it's worth it TBH
/cc @geoand
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Notes from a Zulip discussion:
Having apparently unrelated config properties is an issue IMHO. I would rather have a
route.
config group with everything there.Also:
Something like:
Also I don't know if it makes sense to allow to define several routes? Maybe it's not worth it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: