Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce ensure-only-one: name to example codestarts #11348

Closed
ia3andy opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Introduce ensure-only-one: name to example codestarts #11348

ia3andy opened this issue Aug 12, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ia3andy
Copy link
Contributor

ia3andy commented Aug 12, 2020

Description
Until we resolve this at extension level, we need to make sure that some example codestarts of different implementation of a feature (that would collide if used together) is handled

This issue was raised by @patriot1burke in #11243

Implementation ideas

We could add a new field in codestart.yml:

ensure-only-one: funqy

If more than one funqy is selected, then generation will fail with explanations.

@maxandersen could you link the extension discussion about this?

@ia3andy ia3andy added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Aug 12, 2020
@quarkusbot
Copy link

/cc @quarkusio/devtools

@ia3andy ia3andy closed this as completed Oct 19, 2020
@gsmet gsmet added this to the 1.10 - master milestone Oct 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants