Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

classical controlled operations/gates #2812

Closed
alexandrupaler opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

classical controlled operations/gates #2812

alexandrupaler opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@alexandrupaler
Copy link
Collaborator

Are there plans to support classically controlled gates? Would this be of interest?

@vtomole
Copy link
Collaborator

vtomole commented Mar 5, 2020

#887 is needed in Cirq. is this related?

@alexandrupaler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

alexandrupaler commented Mar 5, 2020

Thank you. It is related. My question started without considering classical registers, although results would need to be stored somewhere.

I was asking because would like to design. optimize and verify teleported-like implementations of circuits consisting entirely of single qubit initialisations, CNOTs and a final round of measurements that control controlled gate/operations (I call this ICM in https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02004)

Should I close this issue or keep it?

@vtomole
Copy link
Collaborator

vtomole commented Mar 5, 2020

Keep it.

@maffoo maffoo added the kind/design-issue A conversation around design label Sep 22, 2020
@balopat balopat added kind/design-issue A conversation around design area/classical area/classical/control and removed kind/design-issue A conversation around design labels Sep 26, 2020
@balopat
Copy link
Contributor

balopat commented Sep 26, 2020

The answer is yes, this is coming next quarter. See the roadmap item #3234.

@balopat balopat closed this as completed Sep 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants