-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License question #52
Comments
@HariSekhon If your program that is using GPL code is published it must be pusblished under GPL license in it's entirity. However if you are using a license that is compatible with GPL you can mix and match them.
So AFAIK you can use GPL2 |
If the license is an issue, there is also a library called xmltodict (https://github.com/martinblech/xmltodict) with an MIT license that can convert dicts to xml (see the |
The alternative library with MIT license. Regular updates, 100% code coverage. https://github.com/javadev/underscore-java/releases |
@claweyenuk Sadly xmltodict doesn't provide the same conversion features as dicttoxml, there are no equivalents for the
@javadev - not sure that would be so useful - that's Java; this is Python. @quandyfactory - could you be persuaded to change the licence to something less "viral" (as GPL 2.0 has been described), or perhaps provide a choice of licences - eg. one of these maybe?
|
Hi,
Quick question - does the GNU GPL2 mean any scripts on github for example that utilize this library also have to be published under the GPL2?
I tend to release my stuff under a custom BSD derived license which makes them free to use, copy and modify and don't want to go back to GPL licensing my works so I'm inclined to not use a GPL library if it takes away my own choice of license on my own works.
Is it possible to license this under the LGPL so that it only applies to this library itself?
Thanks
Hari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: