Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I think renaming is the correct way to go. BTW, I was very busy with different projects in recent days; sadly, I couldn't find time to try sddm-conf, although it was compiled well. I'll try it as soon as I find some time and will tell you about the result here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Closing, the next versions will use the only needed parts of upstream tools and will be a build time only dependency (for the distros like Arch that supports it). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In picom-conf and this project I use a stripped down version of build tools because I need only 3 CMake modules for languages and desktop files translations, avoiding an external dependency (mostly to avoid some version and timing issues with CI I faced previously).
I would like to know if I should rename it to not make confusion with the original and make it a small git submodule for projects that uses it. Basically the files are same as original, except in
LXQtTranslateTs.cmake
, I just modified the hardcoded Qt version variable. Or maybe there is a better solution?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions