We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Current fix for supporting Dual number in the Schroedinger solver #356
TODO;
Related issue; Complex{Dual} support in DiffEqBase.jl (see SciML/DiffEqBase.jl#860)
Complex{Dual}
DiffEqBase.jl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Happy to hear that the Schroedinger solver is now supporting Dual number and then naturally the Forwarddiff. That's great.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Current fix for supporting Dual number in the Schroedinger solver #356
TODO;
Related issue;
Complex{Dual}
support inDiffEqBase.jl
(see SciML/DiffEqBase.jl#860)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: