You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A new lattice should be added to the qiskit_nature.second_q.hamiltonians.lattices module, allowing the simple construction of hexagonal lattices.
Based on this class, we could then also add support for the quick construction of heavy-hex lattices which would be of great use for simulations on IBM Quantum devices.
I am open to discuss whether we want a HeavyHexLattice subclass of the HexagonalLattice or whether we want to a heavy: bool = True keyword argument for the lattice class proposed by this feature request.
Although I have marked #1027 as closing this issue, we will leave the following additions for future extension. As of now, these are not planned but may be picked up by anyone who would like to. Once they do, they should open an issue for the specific feature to be added.
What should we add?
A new lattice should be added to the
qiskit_nature.second_q.hamiltonians.lattices
module, allowing the simple construction of hexagonal lattices.Based on this class, we could then also add support for the quick construction of heavy-hex lattices which would be of great use for simulations on IBM Quantum devices.
I am open to discuss whether we want a
HeavyHexLattice
subclass of theHexagonalLattice
or whether we want to aheavy: bool = True
keyword argument for the lattice class proposed by this feature request.(This suggestion was extracted from #43)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: