You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I have a question about the teaser figure in the GraphSCNet paper. The warp function (10) is defined based on the predicted inlier correspondences. So, that means the paper doesn't deal with the outlier points, but the teaser and results figures show the dense shape reconstruction mesh, I am confused about that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, it is very difficult to accurately infer the motion of the outlier points as there are no inlier correspondences within them. So the motion of these points is mainly constraint (or guessed, which I prefer) by the ARAP term in the N-ICP algorithm. The problem is more severe in low-overlap scenes.
Hi, I have a question about the teaser figure in the GraphSCNet paper. The warp function (10) is defined based on the predicted inlier correspondences. So, that means the paper doesn't deal with the outlier points, but the teaser and results figures show the dense shape reconstruction mesh, I am confused about that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: