Protocols list #1012
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ | ||
| # Qibocal Roadmap | ||
|
|
||
| ### High Priority | ||
| #### Single qubit | ||
|
|
||
| - Rabi and flipping to calibrate pi/2 rotations (https://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~martinisgroup/theses/Chen2018.pdf par. 5.9) | ||
| - Kernels for integration | ||
| - Drag with detuning (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.06560) | ||
| - Cross-entropy benchmarking | ||
| - SNR in spectroscopies and SNR in the IQ plane | ||
| https://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/what-is-the-connection-between-analog-signal-to-noise-ratio-and-signal-to-noise. | ||
| https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.06173.pdf | ||
| - Improve readout amplitude optimization with the outliers probability | ||
| (https://escholarship.org/content/qt0g29b4p0/qt0g29b4p0.pdf?t=prk0gj) | ||
| - Cryoscope (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.04818, https://github.com/qua-platform/qua-libs/blob/main/Quantum-Control-Applications/Superconducting/Single-Flux-Tunable-Transmon/Use%20Case%201%20-%20Paraoanu%20Lab%20-%20Cryoscope/readme.md) | ||
| - Optimal control with randomize benchmarking (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.0035) | ||
|
|
||
| #### Two qubits | ||
|
|
||
| - Cross resonance gates (https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134507) | ||
| - SNZ / Martini Ansatz (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.07411 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.5467) | ||
| - Improve and test coupler routines | ||
| - Measure ZZ coupling in couplers (flux amplitude vs coupling) (Manenti Motta, par. 14.8.4) | ||
| - Improve and test iSWAP implementation | ||
|
|
||
| ### Low Priority | ||
| #### Single Qubit | ||
|
|
||
| - Calibrate the other qubit states | ||
| - Carr-Purcell-Meiboom_Gill sequence | ||
| - Explore cosine pulse as X pulse (https://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~martinisgroup/theses/Chen2018.pdf par. 5.4) | ||
| - Active reset | ||
| - Measurement tomography https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.6448.pdf | ||
| - XY-Z timing | ||
| (https://escholarship.org/content/qt0g29b4p0/qt0g29b4p0.pdf?t=prk0gj par. 5.10) | ||
| - Quantum volume | ||
| - Gate Set Tomography | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Is there a reason to completely exclude the process tomography? There was a problem hiding this comment. No, just forgotten |
||
| - Process Tomography | ||
| - Study Qubit AC-Stark effect | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Speaking of MM. Should we also add other possible implementations of Z rotations? (14.6.4)
As low priority, of course.
Not much because they may be useful as gates, but just because they are possible, and they may be used as further checks on the qubit, since they are playing with the same parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would peronally avoid them since they don't add information, maybe the only one to take into consideration is the one using the AC Stark effect to study the phenomenon itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be fair, that's the one I mostly had in mind...
(the virtual Z we already had, and the composition of other X and Y gates requires a calibration of the Y for arbitrary angles...)
Maybe, the other one I would have considered is fluxing the qubit to measure the Z rotation. As a (redundant?) way to show control over the flux.
In any case, if interesting, we could even reconsider at a later stage.