We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This issue is to keep track of the progress on some minor improvements related to the RAFT training reference, as a follow up to #4644
--weights
--model
--small
--epochs
--num-steps
validate()
evaluate()
--device
cc @datumbox
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I beleieve all the remaining points have been addressed by @YosuaMichael in #5590. Thanks Yosua!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This issue is to keep track of the progress on some minor improvements related to the RAFT training reference, as a follow up to #4644
--weights
param to support the prototype API, once pre-trained weights are available--model
instead of the--small
flag--epochs
param instead of--num-steps
, for consistency with the rest of the training references.validate()
->evaluate()
--device
(?? - not sure how useful it would be)cc @datumbox
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: