-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update int4pack related in torchchat gguf #1404
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ | |
pack_scales_and_zeros, | ||
) | ||
|
||
from torchao.dtypes.utils import is_device | ||
from torchao.utils import TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_6 | ||
|
||
|
||
logger: logging.Logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) | ||
|
||
|
@@ -122,12 +125,20 @@ def linear_int4(input, weight_int4pack, scales_and_zeros, out_features, groupsiz | |
input.dtype | ||
) # cast back to input.dtype | ||
else: | ||
c = torch.ops.aten._weight_int4pack_mm( | ||
input, | ||
weight_int4pack, | ||
groupsize, | ||
scales_and_zeros, | ||
) | ||
if TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_6: | ||
c = torch.ops.aten._weight_int4pack_mm_for_cpu( | ||
input, | ||
weight_int4pack, | ||
groupsize, | ||
scales_and_zeros, | ||
) | ||
else: | ||
c = torch.ops.aten._weight_int4pack_mm( | ||
input, | ||
weight_int4pack, | ||
groupsize, | ||
scales_and_zeros, | ||
) | ||
new_shape = origin_input_size[:-1] + (out_features,) | ||
c = c.reshape(new_shape) | ||
return c | ||
|
@@ -178,16 +189,27 @@ def __init__( | |
), "must specify both weights and scales_and_zeros, or neither" | ||
|
||
if weight is None: | ||
weight = torch.empty( | ||
( | ||
out_features // 8, | ||
in_features // (inner_k_tiles * 16), | ||
32, | ||
inner_k_tiles // 2, | ||
), | ||
dtype=torch.int32, | ||
device=device, | ||
) | ||
if is_device(device, "cpu"): | ||
weight = torch.empty( | ||
( | ||
out_features, | ||
in_features // 2, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nice |
||
), | ||
dtype=torch.uint8, | ||
device=device, | ||
) | ||
else: | ||
weight = torch.empty( | ||
( | ||
out_features // 8, | ||
in_features // (inner_k_tiles * 16), | ||
32, | ||
inner_k_tiles // 2, | ||
), | ||
dtype=torch.int32, | ||
device=device, | ||
) | ||
|
||
scales_and_zeros = torch.empty( | ||
(in_features // groupsize, out_features, 2), | ||
dtype=get_precision(), | ||
|
@@ -223,12 +245,17 @@ def _prepare_weight_and_scales_and_zeros( | |
weight_int32, scales_and_zeros = group_quantize_tensor( | ||
weight_bf16, n_bit=4, groupsize=groupsize | ||
) | ||
weight_uint8 = (weight_int32[::, ::2] << 4 | weight_int32[::, 1::2]).to( | ||
torch.uint8 | ||
) | ||
weight_int4pack = torch.ops.aten._convert_weight_to_int4pack( | ||
weight_uint8, inner_k_tiles | ||
) | ||
if is_device(weight_int32.device.type, "cpu") and TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_6: | ||
weight_int4pack = torch.ops.aten._convert_weight_to_int4pack_for_cpu( | ||
weight_int32, inner_k_tiles | ||
) | ||
else: | ||
weight_uint8 = (weight_int32[::, ::2] << 4 | weight_int32[::, 1::2]).to( | ||
torch.uint8 | ||
) | ||
weight_int4pack = torch.ops.aten._convert_weight_to_int4pack( | ||
weight_uint8, inner_k_tiles | ||
) | ||
return weight_int4pack, scales_and_zeros | ||
|
||
@classmethod | ||
|
@@ -608,10 +635,15 @@ def load_model_and_state_dict( | |
if load_state_dict: | ||
q, s, z = Q4_0.unpack(t) | ||
scales_and_zeros = pack_scales_and_zeros(s, z) | ||
q_uint8 = (q[::, ::2] << 4 | q[::, 1::2]).to(torch.uint8) | ||
weight_int4pack = torch.ops.aten._convert_weight_to_int4pack( | ||
q_uint8, inner_k_tiles | ||
) | ||
if is_device(q.device.type, "cpu") and TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_6: | ||
weight_int4pack = torch.ops.aten._convert_weight_to_int4pack_for_cpu( | ||
q, inner_k_tiles | ||
) | ||
else: | ||
q_tmp = (q[::, ::2] << 4 | q[::, 1::2]).to(torch.uint8) | ||
weight_int4pack = torch.ops.aten._convert_weight_to_int4pack( | ||
q_tmp, inner_k_tiles | ||
) | ||
state_dict[f"{fqn}.weight"] = weight_int4pack | ||
state_dict[f"{fqn}.scales_and_zeros"] = scales_and_zeros | ||
|
||
|
@@ -623,7 +655,7 @@ def load_model_and_state_dict( | |
in_features=in_features, | ||
out_features=out_features, | ||
bias=False, | ||
device="meta", | ||
device="cpu", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Let's keep this as a meta device as long as we can There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Now only CPU acts different from cuda and meta. https://github.com/pytorch/torchchat/pull/1404/files/b884e295a164fa0b8cd172196e4409e51315567b#diff-28cab20c48af32e561f6e95cec7d029fa076708223a00d64afa80ad62b9b52a4R192 Use device meta here cannot tell the right shape of weight. |
||
groupsize=Q4_0.groupsize, | ||
inner_k_tiles=inner_k_tiles, | ||
), | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
torchchat locks onto a specific torch version, so we don't need to check
Assume > 2.6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The CI failures seem that torchao version is not that new, because TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_6 is a new one. And I saw you pin pytorch nightly to 20241013, which is also not new, and this nightly does not have pytorch/pytorch#139611 inside. This is my question, because the nightly used in the CI is 20241126.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup, working on the bump here: #1367
We'll test your fixes on there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!