-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Generic with ParamSpec not subscriptable with multiple arguments [non-generic-variant] #491
Open
Daraan
wants to merge
11
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
Daraan:ParamSpec/Generic-simple
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+172
−5
Open
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
08cdbaa
Basic fix for ParamSpec with Generic
Daraan 076ab7c
Add tests
Daraan 06e5cff
Modified tests
Daraan 4d2bdcb
split tests in two groups
Daraan a280a44
Better comment and unified if statement
Daraan edf7d19
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into ParamSpec/Generic-s…
Daraan 7f362d8
Merge branch 'main' into ParamSpec/Generic-simple
Daraan 9176bb5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into ParamSpec/Generic-s…
Daraan 5491d3a
Restriction does not apply anymore with
Daraan 6d31bbb
test and correct _is_param_expr for typing.Concatenate
Daraan e79fadb
verify _check_generic also for typing variants
Daraan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to check both typing.ParamSpec and typing_extensions.ParamSpec?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not think so. For 3.10 the
_TypeVarLikeMeta
__instancecheck__
oftyping_extensions.ParamSpec
will check for the typing variant.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it might be useful to have a test on 3.10+ that uses
typing.Concatenate
andtyping.ParamSpec
, which are different from thetyping_extensions
version.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests added & like noted in #489 for Concatenate a patch was necessary.