Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Argument Clinic: Better internal implementation for @getter and @setter #113318

Open
corona10 opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Argument Clinic: Better internal implementation for @getter and @setter #113318

corona10 opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@corona10
Copy link
Member

corona10 commented Dec 20, 2023

Even though we successed to provide @getter and @setter features from #112205
The current internal implementation is full of hacky workaround.

We need to improve the internal implementation for better generated C codes and maintenance.
@erlend-aasland wrote some ideas for this: #112205 (comment)

@corona10
Copy link
Member Author

See also: #113160 (comment)

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for creating this issue, Donghee. See #112205 (comment) for more info.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants