Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

introduce FunctionDefinition with a scope to the official collection tree #3926

Open
RonnyPfannschmidt opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

introduce FunctionDefinition with a scope to the official collection tree #3926

RonnyPfannschmidt opened this issue Sep 3, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@RonnyPfannschmidt
Labels
topic: config related to config handling, argument parsing and config file type: refactoring internal improvements to the code

Comments

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

RonnyPfannschmidt commented Sep 3, 2018 •
edited
Loading

FunctionDefinition was introduced as a internal utility to sort out some bad data issues, however we never made it part of the collection tree

ref #2627 for a practial need example

blocked by #6387
@nicoddemus nicoddemus added type: refactoring internal improvements to the code topic: config related to config handling, argument parsing and config file labels Sep 3, 2018
@RonnyPfannschmidt

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@blakeNaccarato blakeNaccarato mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2023
Open
@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt moved this from Todo to In Progress in pytest sprint 2024 Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt

Labels
topic: config related to config handling, argument parsing and config file type: refactoring internal improvements to the code
Projects
detangle node structure
Status: To do
pytest sprint 2024
Status: In Progress
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RonnyPfannschmidt @nicoddemus