You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In addition to supporting brms' existing model-based imputation feature #43 , I would like to propose adding support for multiple responses #42 where a strict subset of responses are fully unobserved. A trivial case of this is specifying random effects in separate formulas:
xf <- bf(x_latent ~ 1)
yf <- bf(y ~ x_latent)
Semantically, this would be identical to the partially missing data case; it would merely be a syntax extension to add additional column(s) for the fully unobserved variable(s) to a user's input dataframe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Extends #43.
In addition to supporting brms' existing model-based imputation feature #43 , I would like to propose adding support for multiple responses #42 where a strict subset of responses are fully unobserved. A trivial case of this is specifying random effects in separate formulas:
Semantically, this would be identical to the partially missing data case; it would merely be a syntax extension to add additional column(s) for the fully unobserved variable(s) to a user's input dataframe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: