You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's no good reason for the current choice of default priors. (e.g. HalfCauchy(scale=3.0) on group standard deviations.) I'm worried that the current defaults might inadvertently give the impression that brmp has similar heuristics to brms for choosing priors, which it doesn't. I think we ought to change the default priors to avoid this. (e.g. Use a standard normal for population level coefs., and a standard half normal for standard deviations perhaps.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's no good reason for the current choice of default priors. (e.g.
HalfCauchy(scale=3.0)
on group standard deviations.) I'm worried that the current defaults might inadvertently give the impression that brmp has similar heuristics to brms for choosing priors, which it doesn't. I think we ought to change the default priors to avoid this. (e.g. Use a standard normal for population level coefs., and a standard half normal for standard deviations perhaps.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: