You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pyreverse generates a graph that depicts the import dependencies between modules. But it doesn't distinguish between imports that are used for runtime functionality and imports that are used only for type checking (that is, imports behind the TYPE_CHECKING flag).
Desired solution
It would be neat if different kinds of import dependencies were distinguished on the graph. For example, regular imports could be notated with a straight line (as is currently the case), while type imports could be notated with a squiggly line. Then it would be possible to tell at a glance what sort of relationship different modules really have.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current problem
Pyreverse generates a graph that depicts the import dependencies between modules. But it doesn't distinguish between imports that are used for runtime functionality and imports that are used only for type checking (that is, imports behind the
TYPE_CHECKING
flag).Desired solution
It would be neat if different kinds of import dependencies were distinguished on the graph. For example, regular imports could be notated with a straight line (as is currently the case), while type imports could be notated with a squiggly line. Then it would be possible to tell at a glance what sort of relationship different modules really have.
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: