You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Single state hysteresis models typically feature a decay rate. So far, this has not been implemented in pybamm as far as I can see.
Previous hysteresis models implemented in pybamm: #2256 and #3194
Motivation
Voltage due to hysteresis can have a long timescale, which is left unmodeled in pybamm. This prevents non-instantaneous hysteresis dynamics from being modeled in pybamm.
Possible Implementation
Decay parameter, dependent on change in lithiation. Personally, I also think it would make more sense to have a single OCP with a hysteresis term than switch between two OCPs. Latz_Plett_hysteresis (1).pdf
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is the recommendation that this applies to SPMe / DFN models with reference to the open-circuit potential and electrode reaction overpotential, for each electrode independently, and locally in the x-dimension?
The Latz and co-workers approach appears to be speaking of the full cell in terms of OCV and SOC. As a DFN / SPMe submodel alternative to current sigmoid, this would presumably need to work with OCP and lithiation extent respectively.
@ejfdickinson - yes. I hadn't thought about the x-dim as I usually work with SPMes, but that makes sense. I've opened a discussion here, as there's a number of improvements to OCP that could be made. #3376
Description
Single state hysteresis models typically feature a decay rate. So far, this has not been implemented in pybamm as far as I can see.
Previous hysteresis models implemented in pybamm:
#2256 and #3194
Motivation
Voltage due to hysteresis can have a long timescale, which is left unmodeled in pybamm. This prevents non-instantaneous hysteresis dynamics from being modeled in pybamm.
Possible Implementation
Decay parameter, dependent on change in lithiation. Personally, I also think it would make more sense to have a single OCP with a hysteresis term than switch between two OCPs.
Latz_Plett_hysteresis (1).pdf
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: