Small bugs in pf.etable() regarding fixed effects information

[s3alfisc]

When the first estimated model contains a fixed effect, but the second does not, the fixed effect column will render nan instead of -.

Example:

import pyfixest as pf

data = pf.get_data()
fit1 = pf.feols("Y ~ X1 | f1", data = data)
fit2 = pf.feols("Y ~ X1", data = data)

pf.etable([fit1, fit2])

Then there is yet another bug!

Printing the models in opposite order, i.e.

pf.etable([fit2, fit1])

all columns below the estimated parameters are not sorted appropriately:

fyi @dsliwka (I think all of this might have been around for a while already).

[s3alfisc]

This does not happen when both models have fixed effects:

import pyfixest as pf

data = pf.get_data()
fit1 = pf.feols("Y ~ X1 | f1", data = data)
fit2 = pf.feols("Y ~ X1 | f2", data = data)

pf.etable([fit1, fit2])

[s3alfisc]

Alberto, who has reported the bug, has already suggested a quick fix =)

[dsliwka]

@s3alfisc: Has the fix solved both issues? Otherwise I of course will have a look. Sorry!

[s3alfisc]

Hi Dirk, not your fault and I have a fix. No need for you to take a look. Just tagged you as an fyi =)