Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not check for upgrade #499

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Do not check for upgrade #499

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

guineveresaenger
Copy link
Contributor

There is no upstream provider.

Do not run upgrade-provider job.

@guineveresaenger guineveresaenger requested a review from a team November 4, 2024 23:02
@guineveresaenger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixes #493.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

Maintainer note: consult the runbook for dealing with any breaking changes.

Copy link
Member

@mjeffryes mjeffryes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically there is an upstream provider (https://github.com/pulumi/terraform-provider-xyz), it just doesn't conform to the script's expectations (since there are no releases). It's probably fine to disable the job here, though it would be cool if we could somehow use this repo to test the upgrade-provider workflows

@guineveresaenger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Filed #500 to track.

@guineveresaenger guineveresaenger merged commit e2b039e into main Nov 4, 2024
23 checks passed
@guineveresaenger guineveresaenger deleted the skip-upgrade-check branch November 4, 2024 23:16
@pulumi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been shipped in release v1.1.34.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants