Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2022. It is now read-only.

Advice on zedboard implementation, please #9

Closed
eejlny opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Advice on zedboard implementation, please #9

eejlny opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@eejlny
Copy link

eejlny commented Nov 13, 2018

Hello,

Using the zedboard branch I have managed to go through all the implementation steps but it seems that with Vivado 2018.2 the resources increase slightly and the design does not fit:

ERROR: [Place 30-640] Place Check : This design requires more Slice LUTs cells t han are available in the target device. This design requires 53754 of such cell types but only 53200 compatible sites are available in the target device.

any suggestions to reduce complexity ? I have tried to reduce the number of NB_CORES cores in pulp_soc_defines.sv from 2 to 1 and the number of NB_TCDM_BANKS from 4 to 2 but then there is a synthesis error.

// CLUSTER
define NB_CORES 2 define NB_TCDM_BANKS 4

@andreaskurth
Copy link
Contributor

The ZedBoard is not supported at the moment. Since you mentioned in #7 that you have access to a ZC706, I suggest you use that. If you want to contribute to bigpulp on the ZedBoard, please join the ongoing discussion in #4.

@eejlny
Copy link
Author

eejlny commented Nov 13, 2018

OK, I do not have access to zc706. I was just trying to verify if that board was at least implementing.

I will join the ongoing discussion #4

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants