You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed that some people may add many redundant and overlapping operations to a spectrum, adding a great deal of overhead which has no analytical function, and which may cause extreme slowness -- for example multiple linearCalibration operations.
I've tried to walk a fine line with /forbidding/ operations which don't make any sense (it's frustrating to have a program tell you not to do something!) but in this case I think we should throw an error rather than let the program run more than one stacked calibration -- it should say "remove the existing calibration to add a new one" or something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've noticed that some people may add many redundant and overlapping operations to a spectrum, adding a great deal of overhead which has no analytical function, and which may cause extreme slowness -- for example multiple linearCalibration operations.
For example: https://spectralworkbench.org/spectrums/83225 seems to have over 1000 tags?
While https://spectralworkbench.org/spectrums/83251 has several redundant calibration tags.
I've tried to walk a fine line with /forbidding/ operations which don't make any sense (it's frustrating to have a program tell you not to do something!) but in this case I think we should throw an error rather than let the program run more than one stacked calibration -- it should say "remove the existing calibration to add a new one" or something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: