You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With #1445 being merged in , we can use the simulated backend to generate blocks and advance the chain. What this means for testing sync is that now we can test how nodes will interact with each other under certain scenarios. Ex: Node A is synced to the current slot of 100 , with sync B we should be able to test if this also sync to the current slot of 100 with the same state root. We can test other scenarios also with multiple nodes.
With #1445 being merged in , we can use the simulated backend to generate blocks and advance the chain. What this means for testing sync is that now we can test how nodes will interact with each other under certain scenarios. Ex: Node A is synced to the current slot of 100 , with sync B we should be able to test if this also sync to the current slot of 100 with the same state root. We can test other scenarios also with multiple nodes.
A high level overview is provided over here https://docs.google.com/document/d/18rZxhdLmM3zfC5RtHHkxuyWd2qDL6h_B6VuSnaVSBVs/edit?usp=sharing
This issue serves as a tracking issue for this.
services.
- [ ] Test syncing with malicious actors, ex : Batched blocks contain a single invalid block.This is also related to #1586
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: