Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENHANCEMENT] VFA Improvement #4245

Open
bluerider098 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[ENHANCEMENT] VFA Improvement #4245

bluerider098 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement Improvement proposal based on existing features.

Comments

@bluerider098
Copy link

Printer model

XL

Describe the enhancement

I have both MK4's and an XL Multitool. The VFA's are noticably worse on the XL vs. the MK4. This is particularly noticeable on circular objects.

I would think the XL with the accelerometer would provide equal results however it does not.

I'm requesting further tuning be done to the XL to provide better results similar to that of the MK4.

Expected functionality

20241009_140717
20241009_140811

@bluerider098 bluerider098 added the enhancement Improvement proposal based on existing features. label Oct 9, 2024
@Ro3Deee
Copy link

Ro3Deee commented Oct 9, 2024

They look like ringing to me. Have you tuned the input shaper frequencies ?

@bluerider098
Copy link
Author

bluerider098 commented Oct 10, 2024

They look like ringing to me. Have you tuned the input shaper frequencies ?

They are set at what the automatic calibration set them at. I've talked with Prusa Support and they recommended tightening the belts tighter than the belt tuning app recommended, but it makes no visible improvement. It's much better than before input shaping was introduced, but not near as good as the MK4.

This is most evident on circular objects. It's hard to see in the photos, but the smoothness of the surface is far superior on the MK4.

I'd argue that if additional manual tuning of the input shaping values is required, then there is still improvement to be made in the firmware. I would expect with a Core XY machine to see equal or better print quality of the print than the I3 style machine.

I'm open for suggestions though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement proposal based on existing features.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants