Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing the Thermocouple IC #10

Open
Mikefly123 opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Changing the Thermocouple IC #10

Mikefly123 opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Mikefly123
Copy link
Member

Current Implementation

Right now the thermocouple on the battery board is a AD8495 feeding into an ADS1015 I2C ADC. This has been working fine for us, but on the V3b spin of the boards the thermocouple has become problematic (see #6 for more).
Screenshot 2024-07-15 at 6 48 40 PM

Rationale for Change

Our existing implementation of the thermocouple would make more sense if we were planning to have multiple thermocouple inputs, since up to four inputs can be fed into the ADS1015 and read individually. In the entire history of the PROVES Kit though, we have not had the need to have more than one thermocouple. Additionally, even if we wanted more than one thermocouple, the battery board is now so crowded there would be no room for the circuit. Therefore, if we wanted more than one couple we would need an expansion board anyways.

If we changed over to an all in one thermocouple IC it could significantly reduce the board's overall part count and slightly compact the layout.

@Mikefly123 Mikefly123 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 16, 2024
@Mikefly123 Mikefly123 self-assigned this Jul 16, 2024
@Mikefly123
Copy link
Member Author

Proposed Change

I'm thinking about swapping everything over to a MAX31856 thermocouple IC. This is supported by Adafruit through their Universal Thermocouple Board. See the data sheet here.

The schematic gets significantly simpler when using this IC instead of the other scheme!
Screenshot 2024-07-15 at 7 14 58 PM

@Mikefly123 Mikefly123 linked a pull request Jul 17, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant