Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include JRuby gem when building gem:native target #8954

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

JasonLunn
Copy link
Contributor

Since this is the rake target used by kokoro, this will close the gem release gap for JRuby

Should help #7923 by making sure JRuby is built and released as part of the normal cadence.

Since this is the rake target used by kokoro, this will close the gem release gap for JRuby

Should help protocolbuffers#7923 by making sure JRuby is built and released as part of the normal cadence.
@JasonLunn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@acozzette - could you rerun the kokoro tests with the second commit included?

@@ -95,7 +97,18 @@ else
]
end

task 'gem:java' do
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ulta nit: should this be jruby to be more clear?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was inclined to align with the terminology used in the Gemfile but I don't feel strongly about it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure thing, was just thinking about future travelers that are reading this, what does "java" mean vs jruby is a clearer target, at least for me.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@haberman / @acozzette - any preference between gem:java vs gem:jruby?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either one sounds OK to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@perezd perezd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@JasonLunn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Obviated by #9047

@JasonLunn JasonLunn closed this Oct 5, 2021
@JasonLunn JasonLunn deleted the patch-1 branch October 8, 2021 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants