Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 13, 2019. It is now read-only.

Remove _total from prometheus_tsdb_storage_blocks_bytes #506

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2019

Conversation

brian-brazil
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil [email protected]

@krasi-georgiev
Copy link
Contributor

krasi-georgiev commented Jan 23, 2019

maybe also update
prometheus_tsdb_size_retentions,
prometheus_tsdb_time_retentions

and add this to the CHANGELOG

@brian-brazil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Those are counters, so there's no need to change them.

@krasi-georgiev
Copy link
Contributor

ok I am not that familiar with the naming convention so will leave it to you.

LGTM

@codesome
Copy link
Contributor

A CHANGELOG entry and we should be good to go.

@brian-brazil
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done

@krasi-georgiev krasi-georgiev merged commit 5db1625 into master Jan 23, 2019
@krasi-georgiev krasi-georgiev deleted the blocks-metric branch January 23, 2019 13:47
@@ -10,6 +12,7 @@
- [REMOVED] `PrefixMatcher` is considered unused so was removed.
- [CLEANUP] `Options.WALFlushInterval` is removed as it wasn't used anywhere.
- [FEATURE] Add new `LiveReader` to WAL pacakge. Added to allow live tailing of a WAL segment, used by Prometheus Remote Write after refactor. The main difference between the new reader and the existing `Reader` is that for `LiveReader` a call to `Next()` that returns false does not mean that there will never be more data to read.
- [CHANGE] Empty blocks are not written during compaction [#374](https://github.com/prometheus/tsdb/pull/374)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- [CHANGE] Empty blocks are not written during compaction [#374](https://github.com/prometheus/tsdb/pull/374)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oo shoot I missed that.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed in #507

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants