You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For a pin like 3.10, the net effect of .* for conda-build is to pull the latest version that is less than the next minor version (i.e., 3.11.0). An equivalent syntax, I think, is python =3.10 (i.e., a single =). rattler-build could use a single = if it does not handle .*
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
beckermr
changed the title
recipe pins appear to be implemented in correctly relative to conda-build
recipe pins appear to be implemented incorrectly relative to conda-build
Nov 8, 2024
It appears that for a bit of yaml like this
with
python_min=3.10
, rattler produces a different spec than conda-build.For rattler-build, I see
See this CI job (https://dev.azure.com/conda-forge/feedstock-builds/_build/results?buildId=1075636&view=logs&jobId=7b6f2c87-f3a7-5133-8d84-7c03a75d9dfc&j=7b6f2c87-f3a7-5133-8d84-7c03a75d9dfc&t=9eb77fd2-8ddd-5444-8fc0-71cb28dcb736)
conda-build adds an implicit
.*
like thisFor a pin like 3.10, the net effect of
.*
for conda-build is to pull the latest version that is less than the next minor version (i.e., 3.11.0). An equivalent syntax, I think, ispython =3.10
(i.e., a single=
). rattler-build could use a single=
if it does not handle.*
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: