Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gumgum: use static bid floor if defined if getFloor module is not provided #6974

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2021

Conversation

lbenmore
Copy link
Contributor

@lbenmore lbenmore commented Jun 8, 2021

Type of change

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • New bidder adapter
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Does this change affect user-facing APIs or examples documented on http://prebid.org?
  • Other

Description of change

In the event that one of our publishers is not using the getFloor module but has provided a static bid floor in the parameters, use the static bid floor when setting the floor price.

@lbenmore lbenmore force-pushed the ADTS-132-fallback-for-bid-floor branch from 32ebd58 to a4d3b09 Compare June 8, 2021 23:21
@lbenmore lbenmore changed the title ADTS-132 Use static bid floor if defined if getFloor module is not provided Gumgum: ADTS-132 Use static bid floor if defined if getFloor module is not provided Jun 8, 2021
@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie changed the title Gumgum: ADTS-132 Use static bid floor if defined if getFloor module is not provided Gumgum: use static bid floor if defined if getFloor module is not provided Jun 9, 2021
@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie self-requested a review June 9, 2021 05:48
@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie self-assigned this Jun 9, 2021
@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie merged commit 64586ad into prebid:master Jun 9, 2021
@lbenmore lbenmore deleted the ADTS-132-fallback-for-bid-floor branch January 4, 2022 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants