Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reverted renaming from PR #234 #247

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

krisbitney
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #246

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files Coverage Δ
packages/builder/src/polywrap_client_config.rs 95.54% <100.00%> (-0.41%) ⬇️
packages/client/src/client.rs 93.86% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/core/src/client.rs 54.54% <ø> (ø)
packages/core/src/resolution/helpers.rs 97.14% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/default-config/src/system_config.rs 99.17% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/native/src/builder.rs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/native/src/client.rs 84.95% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/plugins/logger/src/lib.rs 77.27% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/default-config/src/web3_config.rs 94.54% <66.66%> (ø)

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

Copy link
Contributor

@dOrgJelli dOrgJelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought we were just going to export PolywrapClient... alongside the new shorter names so that it's backwards compatible?

@pileks
Copy link
Contributor

pileks commented Oct 31, 2023

I thought we were just going to export PolywrapClient... alongside the new shorter names so that it's backwards compatible?

@dOrgJelli I've opened a separate PR which does this exactly: #248

@dOrgJelli dOrgJelli closed this Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rename Client back to PolywrapClient
3 participants