-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should nodejs-polars
remain in polars
?
#4148
Comments
polars
? nodejs-polars
remain in polars
?
I can understand it puts a strain on your time and makes it harder to work in your ideal pace. I think it could be transferred to a separate repository. If we then rely on the released crates.io version, the pace will be a lot lower. |
Since we are at this topic, would it be possible to keep the polars releases consistent across Currently, the
Unnecessary inconsistent 😄 |
makes sense to me. |
Yes, I agree. You are doing awesome work and it stays true to the polars project, so I think it can be under the polars umbrella. I am currently on vacation, but I shall open a new repo during or after. |
I'm wondering, should we keep the two linked via a git submodule? |
Just wondering if
nodejs-polars
should remain in the main polars project, or if it should be moved to it's own repo.99% of the PR's are for python or rust, and a lot of these add breaking changes that need to be updated in JS too. Most people don't use the JS bindings, so it makes sense that it isnt being updated, but this causes the JS bindings to regularly fall out of sync with the other two. Being the primary contributor, it is becoming more difficult to keep the JS bindings up to date.
After nearly 8 months, the JS bindings are still rarely used:
~500
downloads a month.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: