Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filter pending logs #2148

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 19, 2019
Merged

Filter pending logs #2148

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 19, 2019

Conversation

saneery
Copy link
Contributor

@saneery saneery commented Jun 12, 2019

#2067

Motivation

There is a problem with pending logs, they don't have fields blockNumber, transactionHash and logIndex openethereum/parity-ethereum#10697

Changelog

  • Filter pending logs

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 12, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build afd47931-85b8-4d2d-84cc-9e38697d5171

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 80.879%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build bcffae98-c61e-4d56-b843-3765b216599c: 0.02%
Covered Lines: 4932
Relevant Lines: 6098

💛 - Coveralls

},
%{
"address" => "0x8bf38d4764929064f2d4d3a56520a76ab3df415c",
"blockHash" => "0xf6b4b8c88df3ebd252ec476328334dc026cf66606a84fb769b3d3cbccc8471bd",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@saneery The update in the test for pending logs contradicts to the statement in the description of PR

There is a problem with pending logs, they don't have fields blockNumber, transactionHash and logIndex

Doesn't it?

I see all of those fields in the test for pending log.

@vbaranov vbaranov merged commit 0ff99d4 into master Jun 19, 2019
@vbaranov vbaranov deleted the pending-txs-logs branch June 19, 2019 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants