New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

reference group should be synonymic list? #238

Closed

myrmoteras opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 1 comment

Contributor

myrmoteras commented May 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

@flsimoes @jugiora looking at this #237 when checking on the susSubSection types I think this

should be a type=taxon_list (thanks @flsimoes ). A reference_group is for TreatmentCitations

myrmoteras changed the title ~~reference group should synonymic list?~~ reference group should be synonymic list?

flsimoes commented May 11, 2023

It's actually taxon_list

flsimoes closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment