Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: update the plan cache strategy when expressions with parameters affect null-check #40218

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 30, 2022
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion expression/expression.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ func SplitDNFItems(onExpr Expression) []Expression {
// If the Expression is a non-constant value, it means the result is unknown.
func EvaluateExprWithNull(ctx sessionctx.Context, schema *Schema, expr Expression) Expression {
if MaybeOverOptimized4PlanCache(ctx, []Expression{expr}) {
return expr
ctx.GetSessionVars().StmtCtx.SetSkipPlanCache(errors.New("skip plan-cache: %v affects null check"))
}
if ctx.GetSessionVars().StmtCtx.InNullRejectCheck {
expr, _ = evaluateExprWithNullInNullRejectCheck(ctx, schema, expr)
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions expression/expression_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ func TestEvaluateExprWithNullAndParameters(t *testing.T) {
ltWithParam, err := newFunctionForTest(ctx, ast.LT, col0, param)
require.NoError(t, err)
res = EvaluateExprWithNull(ctx, schema, ltWithParam)
_, isScalarFunc := res.(*ScalarFunction)
require.True(t, isScalarFunc) // the expression with parameters is not evaluated
_, isConst := res.(*Constant)
require.True(t, isConst) // this expression is evaluated and skip-plan cache flag is set.
require.True(t, ctx.GetSessionVars().StmtCtx.SkipPlanCache)
}

func TestEvaluateExprWithNullNoChangeRetType(t *testing.T) {
Expand Down
82 changes: 82 additions & 0 deletions planner/core/plan_cache_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -221,6 +221,88 @@ func TestIssue38533(t *testing.T) {
tk.MustQuery("select @@last_plan_from_cache").Check(testkit.Rows("0"))
}

func TestInvalidRange(t *testing.T) {
store := testkit.CreateMockStore(t)
tk := testkit.NewTestKit(t, store)
tk.MustExec("use test")
tk.MustExec("create table t (a int, key(a))")
tk.MustExec("prepare st from 'select * from t where a>? and a<?'")
tk.MustExec("set @l=100, @r=10")
tk.MustExec("execute st using @l, @r")

tkProcess := tk.Session().ShowProcess()
ps := []*util.ProcessInfo{tkProcess}
tk.Session().SetSessionManager(&testkit.MockSessionManager{PS: ps})

tk.MustQuery(fmt.Sprintf("explain for connection %d", tkProcess.ID)).CheckAt([]int{0},
[][]interface{}{{"TableDual_5"}}) // use TableDual directly instead of TableFullScan

tk.MustExec("execute st using @l, @r")
tk.MustExec("execute st using @l, @r")
tk.MustQuery("select @@last_plan_from_cache").Check(testkit.Rows("0"))
}

func TestIssue40093(t *testing.T) {
store := testkit.CreateMockStore(t)
tk := testkit.NewTestKit(t, store)
tk.MustExec("use test")
tk.MustExec("create table t1 (a int, b int)")
tk.MustExec("create table t2 (a int, b int, key(b, a))")
tk.MustExec("prepare st from 'select * from t1 left join t2 on t1.a=t2.a where t2.b in (?)'")
tk.MustExec("set @b=1")
tk.MustExec("execute st using @b")

tkProcess := tk.Session().ShowProcess()
ps := []*util.ProcessInfo{tkProcess}
tk.Session().SetSessionManager(&testkit.MockSessionManager{PS: ps})

tk.MustQuery(fmt.Sprintf("explain for connection %d", tkProcess.ID)).CheckAt([]int{0},
[][]interface{}{
{"Projection_9"},
{"└─HashJoin_21"},
{" ├─IndexReader_26(Build)"},
{" │ └─IndexRangeScan_25"}, // RangeScan instead of FullScan
{" └─TableReader_24(Probe)"},
{" └─Selection_23"},
{" └─TableFullScan_22"},
})

tk.MustExec("execute st using @b")
tk.MustExec("execute st using @b")
tk.MustQuery("select @@last_plan_from_cache").Check(testkit.Rows("0"))
}

func TestIssue38205(t *testing.T) {
store := testkit.CreateMockStore(t)
tk := testkit.NewTestKit(t, store)
tk.MustExec("use test")
tk.MustExec("CREATE TABLE `item` (`id` int, `vid` varbinary(16), `sid` int)")
tk.MustExec("CREATE TABLE `lv` (`item_id` int, `sid` int, KEY (`sid`,`item_id`))")

tk.MustExec("prepare stmt from 'SELECT /*+ TIDB_INLJ(lv, item) */ * FROM lv LEFT JOIN item ON lv.sid = item.sid AND lv.item_id = item.id WHERE item.sid = ? AND item.vid IN (?, ?)'")
tk.MustExec("set @a=1, @b='1', @c='3'")
tk.MustExec("execute stmt using @a, @b, @c")

tkProcess := tk.Session().ShowProcess()
ps := []*util.ProcessInfo{tkProcess}
tk.Session().SetSessionManager(&testkit.MockSessionManager{PS: ps})

tk.MustQuery(fmt.Sprintf("explain for connection %d", tkProcess.ID)).CheckAt([]int{0},
[][]interface{}{
{"IndexJoin_10"},
{"├─TableReader_19(Build)"},
{"│ └─Selection_18"},
{"│ └─TableFullScan_17"}, // RangeScan instead of FullScan
{"└─IndexReader_9(Probe)"},
{" └─Selection_8"},
{" └─IndexRangeScan_7"},
})

tk.MustExec("execute stmt using @a, @b, @c")
tk.MustExec("execute stmt using @a, @b, @c")
tk.MustQuery("select @@last_plan_from_cache").Check(testkit.Rows("0"))
}

func TestIgnoreInsertStmt(t *testing.T) {
store := testkit.CreateMockStore(t)
tk := testkit.NewTestKit(t, store)
Expand Down
10 changes: 4 additions & 6 deletions util/ranger/detacher.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -581,9 +581,8 @@ func ExtractEqAndInCondition(sctx sessionctx.Context, conditions []expression.Ex
points[offset] = rb.intersection(points[offset], rb.build(cond, collator), collator)
if len(points[offset]) == 0 { // Early termination if false expression found
if expression.MaybeOverOptimized4PlanCache(sctx, conditions) {
// cannot return an empty-range for plan-cache since the range may become non-empty as parameters change
// for safety, return the whole conditions in this case
return nil, conditions, nil, nil, false
// `a>@x and a<@y` --> `invalid-range if @x>=@y`
sctx.GetSessionVars().StmtCtx.SetSkipPlanCache(errors.Errorf("skip plan-cache: some parameters may be overwritten"))
}
return nil, nil, nil, nil, true
}
Expand All @@ -606,9 +605,8 @@ func ExtractEqAndInCondition(sctx sessionctx.Context, conditions []expression.Ex
accesses[i] = nil
} else if len(points[i]) == 0 { // Early termination if false expression found
if expression.MaybeOverOptimized4PlanCache(sctx, conditions) {
// cannot return an empty-range for plan-cache since the range may become non-empty as parameters change
// for safety, return the whole conditions in this case
return nil, conditions, nil, nil, false
// `a>@x and a<@y` --> `invalid-range if @x>=@y`
sctx.GetSessionVars().StmtCtx.SetSkipPlanCache(errors.Errorf("skip plan-cache: some parameters may be overwritten"))
}
return nil, nil, nil, nil, true
} else {
Expand Down