Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

planner: fix wrong expression deal with memtable predicate extractor #57562

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

planner: fix wrong expression deal with memtable predicate extractor #57562

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #57547

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Nov 20, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2024

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked label, please finished the tests then check the finished items in description.

For example:

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.

@hawkingrei hawkingrei marked this pull request as draft November 20, 2024 11:32
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 20, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from hawkingrei, ensuring that each of them provides their approval before proceeding. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/planner SIG: Planner labels Nov 20, 2024
@tiprow tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 20, 2024

@hawkingrei: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
fast_test_tiprow 06743ff link true /test fast_test_tiprow

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@hawkingrei