We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From #163 (comment) @pixelzoom mentioned that many static IO Type functions like toStateObject and setValue that don't validate using this.validator.
toStateObject
setValue
this.validator
We should make sure we are consistent. This means converting assert to use validate, and adding validate if it isn't there.
assert
validate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This will be addressed by the proposal in #211 which automatically validates. On hold until that issue is further along.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The project has been converted to use new IOType which automatically validates values in toStateObject and applyState. Closing.
new IOType
applyState
chrisklus
zepumph
No branches or pull requests
From #163 (comment) @pixelzoom mentioned that many static IO Type functions like
toStateObject
andsetValue
that don't validate usingthis.validator
.We should make sure we are consistent. This means converting
assert
to usevalidate
, and addingvalidate
if it isn't there.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: