You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From the code review checklist: Is the LICENSE file correct? (GPL v3 for sims, MIT for common code)
inverse-square-law-common is shared by gravity-force-lab, gravity-force-lab-basics, and coulombs-law, implementing much of the model and view for all three sims.
Is this "common" and should it have an MIT license?
I do not know enough to say. Currently has GPL v3, but might need a new license if it requires MIT.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I recall correctly, it is only “common” enough to support a few sims, so should be GPL. This was decided for “circuit-construction-kit-common” and it got classified as GPL. I didn’t search for a paper trail, but let me know if you need one.
On slack chat I said
I do not know enough to say. Currently has GPL v3, but might need a new license if it requires MIT.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: