Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shouldn't rays go behind the control panel? #174

Closed
zepumph opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Shouldn't rays go behind the control panel? #174

zepumph opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@zepumph
Copy link
Member

zepumph commented Aug 5, 2021

From #154

image

@zepumph
Copy link
Member Author

zepumph commented Aug 5, 2021

Even with all this important stuff, I still feel like it should be behind:

image

@veillette
Copy link
Contributor

For reference, the issue of z-layers was also raised in #112.
Assigning to @arouinfar.

@veillette veillette assigned arouinfar and unassigned veillette Aug 11, 2021
@kathy-phet
Copy link

@arouinfar and @kathy-phet decided to revisit the constraints of the lens to make its up down motion less.

@kathy-phet kathy-phet added this to the Prototype Sim milestone Sep 2, 2021
@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor

I was asked to evaluate this for https://github.com/phetsims/geometric-optics/milestone/1. But in the previous comment, I see that design decisions have not been made, so there's nothing I can do.

@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor

Also worth noting:

  • It's not just the rays that go in front of the control panel. Many other things are in front of the control panel. The virtual image, the lens, the mirror, ...

  • The things that are in front of the control panel are BEHIND the controls at the top of the screen (combo box, etc.)

@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor

9/23/21 design meeting: Move play area behind everything else. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants