Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move tandems into options if we use PhETObject? #92

Closed
samreid opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Move tandems into options if we use PhETObject? #92

samreid opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@samreid
Labels
status:on-hold

Comments

@samreid
Copy link
Member

samreid commented Nov 20, 2017

From #86 and pending the results of discussion in phetsims/tandem#31 we may need to move all tandems into options.
@samreid samreid self-assigned this Nov 20, 2017
@samreid
Copy link
Member Author

samreid commented Jan 22, 2018

It's been working acceptably well to require tandems in sim code constructors, and pass through to options in parent classes, I don't think this is worth the effort to change.

@samreid samreid closed this as completed Jan 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@samreid samreid

Labels
status:on-hold
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@samreid