You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That would lead to a cleaner interface for the user. With a bit of work, we could try to make the geometry adhere (almost) to geojson.
Challenge: options for area or multipoint might need different other fields on the class.
Opportunity: perhaps we could use multimethod to overload the load function for different geometries?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#192 already made a first step in this direction by treating Point and Points the same, and standardizing behaviour when points, area, or both are given.
We could add geometry to the baseclass as a union of the three main geometries that we use now:
Then, for each data source, we could suffice with a single class with multiple loaders, e.g.
That would lead to a cleaner interface for the user. With a bit of work, we could try to make the geometry adhere (almost) to geojson.
Challenge: options for area or multipoint might need different other fields on the class.
Opportunity: perhaps we could use multimethod to overload the load function for different geometries?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: