MemoryLogger could be reorganised

[Ducasse]

Hi alistair

I would like to change the logic of the memory logger.
Do you think that it would be possible to have a version without the startAutoSaving?
Do you think that we could also have one version without the dependency to UFFI?

[girba]

I think we could try to model startAutoSaving as a logger decorator.

I am not sure I understand what you mean by the dependency to UFFI. Where do you see this one?

[Ducasse]

This is interesting to try.
You have a reference to LibC to get a current process id as the filename.

[girba]

Oh, I see now. Yes, we will give the decorator approach a try next week.