Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Please consider dual-licensing under LGPL and MIT #67

Open
0x53A opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Please consider dual-licensing under LGPL and MIT #67

0x53A opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@0x53A
Copy link

0x53A commented Aug 4, 2017

Hi @peteraritchie, apologies that I need to bother you again with this.

Do you think it would be possible to dual license LongPath under MIT?

I think our usage in Paket would comply with LGPL, but realistically speaking, if the decision is between having to consult a lawyer, or just not implementing long-path support yet, option b) is more likely.

Thank you again!

(ref fsprojects/Paket#2584)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@0x53A