You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't have the ability to assign a label, but it should be "enhancement."
The issue identified
A data provider is preparing a collection based on data products derived from cross-dispersed echelle spectral observations. The derived data products are 2D arrays, one dimension is spectral, the other is spectral order. This appears to be describable with an Array_2D_Spectrum class. However, the group facets under Primary_Result_Summary do not seem directly applicable:
2D (Spectroscopy) - seems to be better suited for spectral-spatial data: "each pixel value directly represents the spectral measurement at that point." The concept of "at that point" is not clear, but to me it implies a spatial relationship.
Spectral Image (Spectroscopy) - although multiple orders may be present in data described by this facet, it is specifically for focal plane images.
A proposed solution
Adding a new group facet, something to the effect of "Multi-order spectrum."
Clarifying that 2D (Spectroscopy) is for spatial-spectral data.
These may or may not have consequences on the Spectral DD.
Alternatives considered
The alternative seems to be to not describe these data with Group_Facet1, which likely has an impact on discoverability.
PDS4 IM Version
1.24
Need-by Date
First half of 2025 to facilitate archiving of these data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Enhancement
I don't have the ability to assign a label, but it should be "enhancement."
The issue identified
A data provider is preparing a collection based on data products derived from cross-dispersed echelle spectral observations. The derived data products are 2D arrays, one dimension is spectral, the other is spectral order. This appears to be describable with an
Array_2D_Spectrum
class. However, the group facets underPrimary_Result_Summary
do not seem directly applicable:A proposed solution
These may or may not have consequences on the Spectral DD.
Alternatives considered
The alternative seems to be to not describe these data with
Group_Facet1
, which likely has an impact on discoverability.PDS4 IM Version
1.24
Need-by Date
First half of 2025 to facilitate archiving of these data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: