Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default noise models for devices #591

Closed
madagra opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #676
Closed

Default noise models for devices #591

madagra opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #676
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@madagra
Copy link
Collaborator

madagra commented Oct 5, 2023

Currently, the noise model parameters must be chosen to the user according to the available options. However, there is not predefined noise model associated with the available devices, even though the parameters are known.

The proposal is to define some default noise models for the available predefined devices (Chadoq2, AnalogDevice, IroiseMVP) and allow the user to select them if they want to do a noisy simulation.

The proposal comprises the following points:

  • define a noise model for each device using the parameters available in the Qutip emulator backend (the only one currently supporting noise)
  • include the noise model directly in to the device class
  • introduce a flag to turn on and off the noise for the device in case that the backend supports it
  • add the noise model to the serialization schema
@madagra madagra added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 5, 2023
@HGSilveri HGSilveri added this to the v0.17 Release milestone Dec 8, 2023
@HGSilveri HGSilveri removed this from the v0.17 Release milestone Jan 23, 2024
@HGSilveri HGSilveri added this to the Pulser v1 milestone Mar 20, 2024
@HGSilveri HGSilveri self-assigned this Apr 15, 2024
@HGSilveri HGSilveri modified the milestones: Pulser v1, Pulser v0.18 Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants