This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add release-engineering to CI files' reviewers #1413
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joao-paulo-parity
added
A2-insubstantial
chevdor
approved these changes
Jun 27, 2022
sergejparity
approved these changes
Jun 27, 2022
rcny
approved these changes
Jun 29, 2022
chevdor
approved these changes
Jun 29, 2022
coderobe
approved these changes
Jun 29, 2022
|
bot merge |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to what was done for paritytech/polkadot#5733.
@paritytech/release-engineering frequently edits the files reviewed by CI, for instance
The ownership of files in those directories either overlaps with @paritytech/ci or are instead owned by @paritytech/release-engineering, therefore it makes sense to more accurately represent their ownership through pr-custom-review's rules.
After discussion on Matrix, @TriplEight mentioned that it would be fine for @paritytech/release-engineering to be included in the "CI files" rule.