Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Not all parachain logs properly prefixed #120

Closed
JoshOrndorff opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Not all parachain logs properly prefixed #120

JoshOrndorff opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@JoshOrndorff
Copy link
Contributor

In #109 @cecton introduced prefixed for log messages to make it clear whether a log was coming from the relay chain or the parachain. This is a hugely useful feature 🥳 Some logs are still not properly prefixed. I just got this log from the test collator.

2020-06-15 14:48:36 Starting parachain attestation session on top of parent 0x1c97041364ad482843411b61709606b126cf3a4b1628423dfdb7f59b1c6c6527. Local parachain duty is None
@JoshOrndorff
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also got this log without a prefix. I think they both come from parachain?

2020-06-15 15:43:58 Bootnode with peer id `12D3KooWF9dnrcjQ43e2ASgPVy5DXtYpEG3JwHxGx3gudTxBVmXn` is on a different chain (our genesis: 0xf677…0fce theirs: 0x4ed0…5c89)

@bkchr
Copy link
Member

bkchr commented Jun 15, 2020

Yeah we are aware and that is the reason the original issue is still open: #19

So, I close this.

@bkchr bkchr closed this as completed Jun 15, 2020
@bkchr
Copy link
Member

bkchr commented Jun 15, 2020

Also got this log without a prefix. I think they both come from parachain?

2020-06-15 15:43:58 Bootnode with peer id `12D3KooWF9dnrcjQ43e2ASgPVy5DXtYpEG3JwHxGx3gudTxBVmXn` is on a different chain (our genesis: 0xf677…0fce theirs: 0x4ed0…5c89)

If you only have one Collator, it comes from the relay chain.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants