You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let other devs (and not only) understand how to reuse/adapt/modify your code in other open projects and vice-versa.
As you certainly know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
Anyway you can easily choose a "correct" one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve categorization/sorting of collected projects in order to push their evolution by favouring collaborations between developers (and not only).
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there, 1st of all thanks for your awesome work !
Since we've "doxed" it in our HyMPS project (under the AUDIO section \ AI-based page \ Drums), can you please add a "GH-compliant" license file ?
Expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let other devs (and not only) understand how to reuse/adapt/modify your code in other open projects and vice-versa.
As you certainly know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
(badge-generator URL: https://badgen.net/github/license/pagrumiaux/drums_transcription/)
Anyway you can easily choose a "correct" one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve categorization/sorting of collected projects in order to push their evolution by favouring collaborations between developers (and not only).
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: